Sunday, September 13, 2015

GE2015 post-mortem

A watershed is defined as a turning point, a critical change. The "new normal" referred to a supposedly new state of politics here. Clearly, 2011 is now just a wave of national anger, a protest vote. Not that much an endorsement of the Opposition and certainly not an enlightened democratisation of the people.

Granted, with its talent pool and advantages of the incumbent, the PAP has outperformed everyone else, both in policies (housing, welfare) and politics (ground-up, social media). I had forecast it's likelier Opposition support would fall than rise, because Singaporeans are conditioned to be pragmatic. And against the backdrop of SG50 and LKY there was a serious concern for the future versus the follies of the last decade. My worry over Aljunied was also founded on the simple fact that the biggest issue - AHPETC - would only erode support, impossible the opposite.

The silent majority have spoken. They don't care for ideals, they don't care for citizenry empowerment, they don't care for a balanced parliament.

When the first sample count of Mountbatten came in, it gave me an ominous shiver. How could a returning opponent, known for being a local girl who scored 41% the last time, concede over 70%, well a landslide?

With that, came streaming in seats that moved in sync with the national swing - Ang Mo Kio, Jurong, Pasir Ris-Punggol, Bishan-Toa Payoh, Tanjong Pagar, Sembawang, Nee Soon, Tampines, West Coast, Chua Chu Kang, Jalan Besar, Marsiling-Yew Tee, Radin Mas, Yuhua, Bukit Panjang, Hong Kah North, Pioneer...

Fengshan was touted a hot seat not just for its East Coast connection but as a proxy for party brands, as both PAP and WP sent new candidates. A longtime grassroots leader (un-PAP) versus a lawyer (un-Opposition). So if you thought the WP brand is now as strong as the PAP's, Cheryl Chan's 57% says a lot.

If "sacrifical lamb" Fengshan weren't gonna fall, East Coast sure wouldn't. The fact that WP won Aljunied in 2011 with an all-star team, more probably had to be done to the East Coast team, as credible as they looked. My personal dislike of Lim Swee Say and Lee Yi Shyan was somehow also not shared by voters.

If East Coast weren't gonna fall, Marine Parade sure wouldn't. WP's C team was unnecessarily hyped up and despite Goh Chok Tong's regular PR kamikaze, Tan Chuan-Jin is way too popular. The fact that WP cut 7% off 2011's NSP is particularly damning.

Potong Pasir was a non-story for me as I had forecast an easy win for Sitoh Yih Pin. Anti-establishment fervour there was always built around Chiam See Tong's cult of personality. Lina Chiam is not her husband, period. Sitoh looks like the best PAP man for this neighbourhood, not to mention he turned Potong Pasir residents into rabbits. As Leo said, "once tasted flight, forever look at sky". I think Singaporeans can forever banish to history books whatever "conscience of Singapore" and "my kind of town".

The shocker and disappointment for me was Punggol East. Is Lee Li Lian capable? Only the residents would know. But the fact that she was ousted after winning 54% just two years ago against a man probably more impressive than Charles Chong proves Singaporeans are more fearless in a by-election when nothing's at stake. Voters preferred a retiree over a breath of fresh air. Chong suddenly has a few more years of income, even if he does nothing in Parliament. Ah Lian is now unemployed.

I admire WP's policy to let candidates grow roots, but I felt Sengkang West was ripe for the picking, since the only issue there was unfavourable to the PAP. Maybe a bigger name would've performed better than Koh Choong Yong.

So clearly, the Easties are not as enlightened as we thought, the Potong Pasir kampung is not as dogged, and the Sengkang-Punggolites are not the progressive young families as described.

Another place ripe for the picking but overlooked was Bukit Batok - new place, inexperienced PAP candidate, history of Opposition support. Just imagine David Ong up against Chee Soon Juan or even Tan Jee Say or Benjamin Pwee. In the end most of the better-known non-WP candidates suffered from hubris. Chee's return from the wilderness very unfortunately ran into a national swing.

Kudos to PAP for letting Tin Pei Ling strike out on her own and shame on those who felt she was abandoned by Marine Parade. Tin has done good stuff in MacPherson. WP wanted it simply to flex its muscles in this part of the island. If it were politically opportunistic it wouldn't have dispatched a 29-year-old to challenge an incumbent who four years ago was flamed precisely for her youth.

How one sees WP's defence of Aljunied and Hougang depends on one's school of thought. Hougang showed its resolve, Aljunied survived - but on a whole, you can say both lost support or you can argue both took a conservative hit compared to PAP's national improvement. The question now is will Singapore's bluest precincts continue their slide from WP's grip? The common assumption is when opposition turns white, he seldom turns back.

One of the most incongruous things I heard this GE was PAP's call for votes so as to make the Opposition work harder, instead of the opposite. It was Uniquely Singapore Democracy, but ironically, it might have convinced a few. Indeed, even with a bizarre remark, some people probably identified more with the safety net of the incumbent.

Do Singaporeans in general want to help develop a credible Opposition? I suspect not. Some whine at them for being too quiet or too noisy, without acknowledging the field is not level and you just can't expect an untested Opposition member to be like a polished PAP man. Remember, the political awakening of the late 1980s was snuffed out by 1997 - see what the "mandate" did. Several Opposition members have now expressed Friday's results as demoralising. Let's hope Singaporeans' decision to punish the Opposition does not lead to an exodus. Live with your sacred vote and stfu if things go awry. If you want Hougang and Aljunied to bear the Opposition presence in Parliament, maybe we should rewrite the laws to make MPs only speak for their own constituents.

On the other hand, the government has no doubt resoundingly responded since 2011. If that was the moment PAP forever became sensitive to the people, we're better for it. Why am I willing to say this out loud? Because I can be rational regardless of my badge and I love my country as much as you do. If anyone can, it's the PAP. But more so, because Singapore can.

Saturday, July 25, 2015

breaking down the ignition of the ST elections machine

so i heard campaigning will be during the week i'm at reservist. fml. elections come around every four, five years yet i'll be constitutionally locked away.

i can still follow now though. and Straits Times' day one coverage of the release of the boundaries report earns a fat zero from me. as long proven, they have a handful of good reporters who report well in isolation. but when something major comes around, especially when it's political, the whip falls and the tone falls in line. seven pages loaded with distasteful charade. 

choice of words

mild, modest, no gerrymandering - these were repeatedly used to describe the report. really? despite quoting stats (don't forget that stats can always be presented in favour of arguments) the committee clearly did (and didn't do) a few things.
  1. Joo Chiat and Moulmein-Kallang, two spots the PAP could very possibly lose, disappeared.
  2. don't believe for a second that maintaining Potong Pasir, Aljunied, Hougang and Punggol East shows the review was fair. if you're the incumbent PAP, that's the wise thing to do to not rile Opposition sympathisers.
  3. the anomaly that's Potong Pasir SMC wouldn't have survived if the PAP weren't confident of repeating victory. Chiam is never coming back, Sitoh is not bad and Lina is bad, period.
  4. the PAP found out that Tin Pei Ling is toxic, not as a person - because i really find her capable - but as an election topic. there's no other obvious reason MacPherson has been ejected. let the girl strike out on her own.
  5. what's the logic in praising the minimal change when the PM himself had called for shrinking GRCs and increasing SMCs? retaining the giant Ang Mo Kio and Pasir Ris-Punggol GRCs has no justification while SMCs only increased by a paltry one. voters were instead stealthily shifted from Pasir Ris-Punggol to Ang Mo Kio, Ang Mo Kio to Nee Soon, then Nee Soon to Sembawang.
cover story

the selection of a single, conservative "objective voice" is clearly intentional:
"By and large, it's a very modest shift, nothing too radical."

patronisingly featuring the Opposition is worse. here's Gerald Giam's quote:
"We have to study the report very carefully to decide which one we want to contest in."
the Chua sisters

if you haven't already seen through Mui Hoong's tricks, here's how she uses ST's opinion pages for propaganda: she slaps on a progressive headline and standfirst, in this case describing the report as "a few puzzles" and "Joo Chiat draws flak", and once she gets the eyeballs, proceeds to brainwash you with a different angle that's often heavily one-sided.

here she reasons that whatever your feelings, all is fair simply because Aljunied, Hougang and Punggol East remain. this completely ignores the fact that, like previous elections, such a move can be politically motivated in itself as a policy of containment and appeasement.

she also emphasised that the committee's TOR were "technical". but given the PM's very straightforward TOR, the report doesn't explain certain actions that appeared more political than technical.

the East Coast-Fengshan relationship

the paper likes you to think that retaining the shaky East Coast GRC shows the committee is fair to the Opposition and the PAP is willing to fight for it. but little that's constructive has been discussed about creating a Fengshan SMC.

the latter borders the blue Aljunied almost like a moat for the 45% blue East Coast. it's very possible that given the demographics and climate, the PAP prefers to play safe and cede one seat, instead salvaging the GRC. this one-step-back-two-steps-forward tactic will appeal to the moderates.

who's currently representing Fengshan? ex-minister Raymond Lim, a suitable sacrificial lamb.

where's the journalism?

instead of asking why Moulmein-Kallang has been completely undone, it celebrates the return of Jalan Besar, footnoting with sentimentality over Moulmein's breakup.

simi sai? machiam feel-good newsletter. sort of like everyone accuses you of stealing money and your clique celebrates you setting up a taskforce to investigate everyone but yourself.

err, Whampoa?

the day one coverage spends substantial column inches wondering why Whampoa SMC's gone, when the truth is it isn't important. safe ward means cannot redraw? as the incumbent, the PAP can redraw any wards they wish as long as they feel confident about it. they don't worry over single seats, they only target to form the government.

this already smells like an editor decided that due to the heavy coverage of lightning-rod constituencies and the Opposition, to be balanced let's try imagining some PAP pains.

more partisan reportage
"Not surprisingly, the release of the report has been accompanied by some calls from opposition politicians for the committee - in the name of fair play and transparency - to justify its decisions and show how the boundaries came to be determined."
this sentence sounds dubious. why must "Not surprisingly"?

Wednesday, June 03, 2015

a surreal argument in the media

soon after I started watching football, Havelange made way for Blatter. a lot seemed to have gone wrong in the world's most important sport since, according to the Western media. there's something sinister about him and his tenure, but I don't know if my impression is defensible. he can be really bizarre, I admit. a lot of questions have been asked, mostly about money, and I wish there were more answers. but I'm not sure accountability means you have to answer every question fired in your direction.

some of the things during Blatter's tenure were really suspicious and there's every chance there's wrongdoing. but what is this "free world" and "checks and balances" the West preaches?

what is this all-out assault on the one-federation-one-vote system that's called democracy? yes, Africa, Asia and some other parts of the world have a poor reputation with accounts, but apart from actually winning votes from the majority of the world, was Blatter's channelling of funds to football's lesser lights wrong in principle? is this the so-called "Western hypocrisy" so many in my side of the world have spoken about? what is this bigoted discourse in the Western media that power should return to the traditional base of Europe?

suddenly, they've succeeded, and I'm not certain football is better for it. what I do know is that much of European football is owned or sponsored by non-European money.

Monday, April 27, 2015

i like motion pictures

okay what a mindfuck, this Unlucky Plaza. it starts slow and has its flaws when taken against Hollywood, but good films are a journey and this one keeps you glued. thriller, mystery, comedy, caper, noir, Western, farce, whodunit, story within story, social commentary, Tarantino -- what's in a genre? refreshingly layered for a local film, with nuances that put Jack Neo to shame. he won't smash the box office like Neo, but after The Blue Mansion, Kidnapper, Sex.Violence.FamilyValues and now this, Ken Kwek is one to watch.

Sunday, April 26, 2015

Off Centre (The Studios: fifty)

for a lack of words: "Off Centre breaks your heart in several places and salts open wounds. Its characters are often frustrating. But you emerge from it with an enduring empathy for all humankind."

so far, 'The Studios: fifty' has been good albeit slightly artificial. but this, one of the best productions i've seen in a while. seamless, a near-perfect script, very well directed, very well acted, down to the smallest part.

Sunday, April 05, 2015

Emily of Emerald Hill (The Studios: fifty)

so tragic, this Emily of Emerald Hill. karen tan, good with all the code switch, even better with the simplest, subtlest drop in register to shake the audience with her son's death; but she remains a motormouth at times. the symbolism of the final quilt, a life's work yet used in solitude. and the paradox of control, where the more one has of it, after a certain point one stops being indispensable. likewise, those without power are free. those who say the text is dated and has lost its relevance need only look at the debates of the last fortnight.

Tuesday, February 24, 2015

i like motion pictures

even by jack neo's standards, ABTM3 is an epic piece of trash. it has no dramatic structure, it has no flow, it has narcissistic acting, it rips off the original ABTM, it lets NDU down, and "product placement" is a very generous compliment. pockets of humour are no redemption.

Monday, February 23, 2015

Oscars 2015 predictions

Birdman, Boyhood too close to call, while Selma, Whiplash deserve special mentions. Redmayne, Moore, Simmons for me. Whiplash, Inherent Vice, Nightcrawler and Birdman are probably the best screenplays. I hope Birdman doesn't get cinematography even though it's really wow.

Wednesday, January 14, 2015

i like motion pictures

superb Eddie Redmayne, not-so-superb film. five-star love story, one-star science story. less a tearjerking Bang than a cruel motor-neuron disease that slowly eats at you and fills you with sadness. pity for the excellent Felicity Jones, who pales in comparison. i also hope it's a reminder that the Big Bang Theory is not just an American sitcom.

Sunday, November 16, 2014

i like motion pictures

polarising film. visually, aurally the standard bearer, thematically heavy and assured, but smacks too much of 'science geek' (albeit very, very good science). Nolan has astronomical imagination and intelligence, but this film is hampered by its writing, from character to dialogue, and with its attempts at heart smothered by science. the fact i wished it's shorter when objectively it should be longer says a little about Nolan's pacing and control of his material. also i'm sharing this article (The 7 biggest problems with “Interstellar”) cos it's so damn hilarious.

Wednesday, October 29, 2014

i like motion pictures

"Everything is a performance, everyone pretending to be something they are not, editing and rewriting themselves for the public – and for one another." (The Guardian)

watch Fincher if you wanna understand what people mean by auteurs. the stamp of his art embodies the film. this is Mr & Mrs Smith in Fincher's misanthropic style. constantly baiting and duping. beneath the fiction, a study on relationships, gender-based violence, and the media. not to mention that score - delicious. pity it was classic Fincher two-thirds the way, then went downhill.

Saturday, September 13, 2014

i like motion pictures

《等一个人咖啡》. 第一念头一定是能否跳出《那些年》的影子. 不是高期望就是没期望.

《等一个人咖啡》. 无厘头 天马行空 乱七八糟. yet thoroughly disguised with twists and clues, peppered with baits and references.
《那些年》谈的是错过, 《等一个人》谈的是等待. 别人叙述的爱情是主动, 它叙述的爱情是被动. 爱情不仅仅是追求.
怎么说它成功? 当陈妍希在片尾客串, 观众最疼, 最支持的还是思萤. 这一定是它成功的代表.

Sunday, March 30, 2014

Nanjing 2014 Young Ambassadors' Seminar

an exclusive customs counter. a hotel entourage of about 20 to receive us, including a guard of honour serving desserts and hot towels. too much. i felt bad for opening my own car door - hope i didn't get the suited man who rushed over in trouble. no Facebook in China. lunch with Vincent Defrasne. invited to an IOC-NYOGOC technical meeting. communicated to them that the Games news service shall have editorial independence and not be censored. conducted media training for 104 Young Ambassadors. helped screen the final two Nanjing 2014 Young Reporters. bumped into Gilbert Felli in the lift. earned mentions in the Chefs de Mission seminar and IOC Coordination Commission meeting. too pampered. addressed as 陈先生 everywhere in the hotel and served daily by visiting Capella Singapore restaurant staff. what was supposed to be a week-long assignment turned out to be one of my best experiences. shoutout to the IOC YOG CEP team, NYOGOC, Xinhua, Han Yue Lou Hotel and all the Young Ambassadors. how to adjust back to reality?

Sunday, March 02, 2014

i like motion pictures

12 years a slave portrays a dark period of American history, has gorgeous shots, and has strong backing - all ingredients for success tonight. but even if it wins the statuette, Gravity was the best film of the year. because it achieved what filmmaking should - it constructed an unusual premise and surprised.

Thursday, February 13, 2014

Olympic Record

has to be a personal record.

my flash quotes of luge gold medallists Tobias Wendl and Tobias Alrt were out 18mins after the medal alert. between them winning and reaching the mixed zone, they still had a podium ceremony. my quotes were filed before they were halfway through the broadcast pen, before they reached the wire agencies and the rest of the German media.

so, i've come a long way since the days i was told i was too slow.